Skip to Main Content

Health Psychology (PS 295)

Resources for study and research concerning the relationship between attitudes and personality factors and health, including stress management and behavioral change.

Statistical Analysis

Survey Software

In addition to the sophisticated commercial software used in survey creation, there are numerous online programs available for free.  Review recommendations in your course materials and discuss your specific needs with your instructor.  Below are some interesting free programs.

Survey Monkey

Survey Monkey is an online tool for the creation and management of survey research.  Basic features are accessible with a free account; additional featuares are available by purchasing the "PRO Plan".

Zoomerang

Zoomerang offers embeddable online polling and survey tools with a free account.

LimeSurvey

A new free open-source program for suveys, now in Beta release.

Survey Says . . .

Designing Research Surveys

Pre-Research Literature Review and Critique

Don't Be Boring -- Don't Be Repetitive!

University-level research is not the same as a high school report, not just patching together quotes and paraphrases of existing information ("patchwriting"). It should be new (and hopefully interesting) work.

In choosing an area for original research, a careful review of reported research in the field identifies areas that need clarification or elucidation, areas with conflicting results, areas with gaps in the research, and areas yet to be explored. Beginning student researchers sometimes dismiss initial literature reviews as a waste of time, seeing this step as an annoying hoop to jump through and postponing this until a great deal of work has been invested in their research.  Don't fall into this trap!

Literature Review

Actually, a literature review is critical to identifying  questions that are worthy of your time as a researcher and of your readers' time.  You will identify concepts that are already thoroughly researched and understood and distinguish areas that would benefit from additional study or new approaches.  You will be forewarned of practical problems you may encounter.  Instead of being a rehash of the field, your work can be a building block of knowledge, providing new support for a theory or technique or describing a novel approach to a problem. 

Often, a meta-analysis of existing research produces a valuable synthesis of results and sometimes conflicting perspectives. A scholarly review goes beyond listing sources found and adds a critical evaluation of that research. Here are some useful guides on the methods of a scholarly literature review.

 

Annotated Bibliographies

Organized notes on the reported research that you review will be your treasure map to identify the richest veins to be mined for your project. In addition to "perfect" resources, your annotated bibliography can explain the deficiencies of others and thus the need for your research. You may do this informally for your own convenience, or as a formal presentation to your professor and your colleagues.  Here are some useful tips on the academic way to note your analysis and evaluation of a resource.

Choosing, Evaluating, and Using Existing Research

After finding a topic of interest, map out the trails that other researchers have explored. The books below illustrate key questions to answer during your literature review about the existing state of research and provide a systematic approach for collecting this information.

 

Research Design & Evaluation

The choice of research methods affects the value and reliability of both the research reports you review and the reader's evaluation of your research project.  Both qualitative methods (e.g. surveys and interviews) and quantitative methods (questions that can be answered by an objective or numerical value, e.g. ages, census data, grade level, etc.) are used and sometimes combined ("mixed methods").

Refer to the online tool e-Source Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, developed by the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health. It offers " authoritative answers to methodological questions on behavioral and social science research. With contributions from a team of international experts, this anthology provides the latest information on addressing emerging challenges in public health."

Methodological Reform 101 for developmental researchers -  M. Brent Donnellan, Glenn I. Roisman, R. Chris Fraley, and Richard E. Lucas. Developmental Psychologist  (July 2013).

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses blend (1) qualitative reviews of the key features of reported studies (PICO - population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) for a particular condition, and (2) a synthesis of the effect size of the results of those studies. A recent article provides a concise summary of this process:

Uman, L.S. (2011). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(1), 57-59. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024725/.

Conducting Qualitative Research

Accessibility